Action Report 2 Example

Activity Report 2 Example Activity Report 2 †Article Example Activity Report 2 The huge issue, as per Stiglitz concerns whether total national output (GDP) offers a prevalent proportion of expectations for everyday comforts. In various cases, GDP insights seem to recommend that the money related framework is improving contrasted with most residents own considerations (Stiglitz 1). Likewise, the focus on GDP prompts clashes: pioneers (political) are asked to amplify it, yet residents, then again, additionally necessitate that consideration be given to improving security, lessening water, air, just as clamor contamination, and the preferences †all of which may diminish GDP development. Similar issues in making examinations at the appointed time identified with correlations across countries (Stiglitz 1). The US utilizes more cash on human services looked at some other countries yet gets a lot more unfortunate outcomes. Some portion of the uniqueness between GDP per capita in Europe and the US may consequently be because of the manner in whic h individuals measure things.Another noteworthy change in many nations is an ascent in disparity (Stiglitz 1). This implies there is a rising difference between the middle pay (that of the typical worker, whose compensation lies falls in the pay dispersion table) and normal pay. In the event that a couple of individuals working in the bank get more extravagant, normal or mean pay can increment, even as most peoples’ livelihoods are diminishing (Stiglitz 1). In this manner, GDP per capita measurements probably won't reverberation what is happening to most residents. Any appropriate proportion of how well nations are performing should consider supportability, also (Stiglitz 1). Similarly as an organization requires estimating the decrease of its capital, so does national records require mirroring the drop of characteristic assets, just as the debasement of the environment.Work CitedStiglitz, Joseph. The incomparable GDP cheat. N.p, 2009. Web.

Marketing Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Promoting - Case Study Example As far as character, Starbucks targets individuals who need to stand apart as people while Dunkins clients are individuals who need to be a piece of a group. The portion that Dunkins is endeavoring to reach through situating is the thing that can be delegated regular person - the center salary blue-and cubicle laborers over all ages, races; who like to have a place in a group; who despite the fact that qualities more pleasant stores they like it to interest the normal Americans. These individuals don't care for the extravagant store designs of love seats, workmanship brightened dividers and diverse music; they likewise don't care for impressively sounding labelsâ€they grumbled that considering a hot sandwich a panini is excessively extravagant, in this manner it is renamed as stuffed liquefy. They like increasingly available items like flatbread sandwiches and gourmet treats as opposed to pinwheels of batters loaded down with different fillings, which help them to remember something they have during mixed drink hours rather than not too bad suppers. Truly, certainly. Showcasing is tied in with finding the correct clients and giving qualities. A gigantic market can't be served distinctly by one player. There are various kinds of shoppers, and even to a huge player, giving all the necessities and needs of the entire market will demonstrate expensive and will dissolve their benefits. Consequently, they decide to serve the clients they serve best. In the coffeehouse advertise, the higher pay and expert gatherings are the objective of Starbucks, individuals who need to stand apart as people. Yet, there are different kinds of clients. Furthermore, seeing this fragment not being served well gives a gigantic favorable position to Dunkins. In the wake of knowing the unmistakable needs of this section, an incentive that conveys the message about the advantages the organization offers to satisfy these requirements is simply sensible. In the event that Dunkins rather contends with Starbucks in the other section of the market and give a simi lar incentive, it will just come up as second best, or an imitator

Admission Decisions Piles of Files COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

Admission Decisions Piles of Files COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog The most common question we are getting on the phone and via email these days is, “When will I find out about my admission decision?” In a perfect world I could tell you all the exact date and time, and I could also guarantee that every decision would be published on the same day. However, we live in the real world and not the perfect world. The real admission world, just like the real policy world, can be a bit tricky. With numerous people reading files and some subcommittees meeting to discuss certain applications in more detail it is a balancing act. When applications are confirmed as complete they are assigned to readers and begin the review journey.   Readers belong to three general groups: faculty, students, and administrators.   Each group brings their own viewpoint to the table so there is nice balance. After the readers have filled out their review sheets and discussed their feelings about each candidate with other readers the files are divided into three major groups. Let me elaborate on the process by describing the following picture Pile #1 is representative of applications where there is unanimous agreement among Committee members. I would say that about 60-65% of applications fall into this group. Pile #2 represents those where the reviewers of the file did not entirely agree and they have asked for additional review by a Senior Member of the Admissions Committee prior to making a final decision. Approximately 20-25% of applications fall into this category. Pile #3 represents those who the readers believe should be considered for first year fellowship awards â€" approximately 15-20%. These files take longer to process because they have to go through additional rounds of meetings by the Fellowship Committee. Reviewing applications is not an exact science and decisions may not go out in the simple 1-2-3 order described above, but this is generally how the process works. Rather than make the majority of applicants wait until the Committee has reviewed all of the files, we will start to send out decisions when the majority of decisions have been made. Our goal is to start sending decisions in the first or second week of March.   We will inform you of when your decision is ready to view by sending you an email telling you to log in to the application site to view your decision letter.   I will also post an entry to this blog when the first round of decisions have been sent. Admitted applicants will receive a paper copy of the same letter posted on the site a number of weeks later. Applicants who are not admitted will only see the letter on the application Web site; we do not send a paper copy of letters to those who are not admitted. I hope this provides a bit of insight into the process and I will continue to elaborate on the process in the coming weeks.

Solving The Physics Of The Problem - 1393 Words

As the name suggests, there are no basic guidelines for these algorithms, hence it is unsupervised. These algorithms can be used to discover various pattern, divide the data into various clusters, reducing the dimensionality of the dataset for viewing, which may help researchers in better understanding of the physics of the problem. Here, an expert needs to be careful while choosing a certain algorithm and associated parameters for a specific case. Additionally, an expert needs to be very careful while interpreting the findings from these algorithms. One must use the technical aspects regarding the basic physics of the problem so that their results are meaningful and for it to be accepted by the materials research specialists for†¦show more content†¦The final result is a tree like structure referred as Dendrogram, which shows the way the clusters are related. User can specify a distance or number of clusters to view the dataset in disjoint groups. In this way, the user can get rid of a cluster that does not serve any purpose as per his expertise. In this case, we used MVA (Multivariate data analysis) node in optimization package: modeFRONTIER (ESTECO, 2015) and other statistical software IBM SPSS (IBMSPSS, 2015) for HCA analysis. Clusters are classified by following measures (ESTECO, 2015) 1. Internal similarity (ISim): It reflects the compactness of the k-th cluster. It must be higher. 2. External similarity (ESim): It reflects the uniqueness of the k - th cluster. It must be lower. 3. Descriptive variables: are the most significant variables that help in identifying cluster elements that are similar to one another. 4. Discriminating variables: are the most significant variables that help in identifying cluster elements that are dissimilar to other clusters. HCA analysis can be used to cross check the findings of SVR analysis mentioned above in the text. 4.3.2 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Principal component analysis can be classified as an unsupervised learning machine-learning algorithm [Mueller et~al., 2015]. It was performed in order to determine correlations

Did you know that in a 2013 study, 1,668,420 Americans...

Did you know that in a 2013 study, 1,668,420 Americans underwent cosmetic surgery in order to alter their body to fit the body image they view as the norm in society. More and more Americans are complying to undergo cosmetic procedures without understand the possible fatal risks. As medical advancements and improved procedures are being introduced, the risks seem to increase. Since society has placed significant pressure on the physical attributes of adolescents and adults, cosmetic treatments are being performed and considered at an all-time high while compelling potential harmful and fatal consequences. Due to the psychical and psychological hazards of cosmetic surgery, plastic surgery for cosmetic enhancements should be terminated.†¦show more content†¦By transforming into an ideal beauty, they earn the approval of others and receive positive attention. Some people even have â€Å"coming-out parties.† But while plastic surgery may appear to increase confidence, ità ¢â‚¬â„¢s often an illusion even to the patients themselves, who might confuse real self-esteem with the joy of feeling as though others approve of their appearance. Altering one’s body can carry with it an undesirable outcome. Changing or altering one section of your body or specific body part can cause another body part to negatively alter itself. For example, if someone undergoes a liposuction procedure in their stomach, that ultimately kills the fat cells in the stomach and then therefore causes an increase in fat cells in thighs or arms (Forbes). Due to this outcome, some procedures won’t give the patients the desired outcome they hoped to achieve. Also, the recovery of the cosmetic surgery itself can be difficult and leave permanent damage. Enhancement on one’s body can cause a great deal of psychological problems. Some patients become diagnosed with Body Dimorphic Disorder, or BDD , which is a psychological disorder in which once a patient has one procedu re done, they find another imperfection and feel compelled to go and alter that too. After someone changes one part of themselves, they see all their other body parts as undesirable. In fact, many women who undergo cosmetic surgery have a higher chance of

The Bioethics Debate Free Essays

Kristi Ellis Mrs. Scheidt English 1301. 174 11 October 2012 Paper #2 – The Bioethics Debate In â€Å"Patenting Life,† by Michael Crichton, and â€Å"Bioethics and the Stem Cell Research Debate,† by Robyn S. We will write a custom essay sample on The Bioethics Debate or any similar topic only for you Order Now Shapiro, they discuss gene patenting, medicine, stem cell research, and the laws of bioethics. According to Crichton and Shapiro, humans are all born with genes, stem cells, and organs that are part of our natural world, yet when the law tries to put limits on these rights it becomes unethical. Crichton and Shapiro both agree about the controversial issues surrounding science and medicine. They both point out the unethical issues, the innovation in medicine, and the impact on science and medicine in relation to the law. In both essays Crichton and Shapiro list many immoralities that arise out of bioethical issues. For instance, Crichton refers to an example of the Canavan disease in which the process to find a cure was halted due to gene patenting. It was a prime example of an issue that was unethical because the owner of the gene for the disease could choose whether or not to charge for a test and choose how much to charge for it, which blocks medical innovations. Crichton states, â€Å"There is no clearer indication that gene patents block innovation, inhibit research and put us all at risk† (432). Crichton goes on to say that genes are part of humans naturally and should not be privately owned (431). In comparison, Shapiro explains although embryonic stem cells give promise to the medical field, many ethical issues surround it such as the destruction of the embryo. Shapiro also writes that those who denounce embryonic stem cell research believe the embryo is already a human being with rights from conception, while others believe that human rights do not exist prior to birth (435). Additionally, medical advancement is critical for innovation in both essays. Crichton states that gene patenting prevents medical testing and slows medical advancement. Not only does it halt research, but it causes the costs of medical testing to rise because the owner can charge whatever he wants (431). He mentions doctors cannot get information on if a medication will or will not work on someone because the lack of quality tests. Crichton says â€Å"For years we’ve been promised the coming era of personalized medicine – medicine suited to our particular body makeup. Gene patents destroy that dream† (432). In contrast, Shapiro states that stem cells are important to the medical field because they can turn into a wide array of cell types that can help people with diseases such as diabetes, nervous system diseases, and Parkinson’s disease (434-35). In addition, he says stem cell research could provide important information on how human organs and tissues develop, which could lead to development of new medications (435). In both sources, the law plays a significant role in the unethical issues surrounding science and medicine. Crichton mentions how the United States Patent Office issued gene patents by mistake because of misinterpreted Supreme Court rulings. The issue of gene patents make it hard for people to donate their genes because most of the genes are privately owned (431). Crichton states that two congressman sponsored the genomic research and Accessibility Act, a bill that would ban patenting genes in nature (432). Shapiro denotes the growing importance of the law surrounding bioethical issues. He cites the United States Supreme Court cases of Roe v. Wade and Stenberg v. Carkart which dealt with a partial birth abortion law. Shapiro states, â€Å"In state courts, bioethical considerations inform judges’ balancing of patient healthcare confidentiality with a â€Å"duty to warn† of potentially dangerous patient behavior (433). The most significant law Shapiro cites is the Dickey Amendment which prohibits federal funding for embryo research (436). Shapiro mentions in addition to federal funding restrictions, many states have laws that limit embryonic stem cell research. Lastly, he cites the eligibility of federal patent protections significantly, the Thomson Patents (437). In conclusion, both Crichton and Shapiro can conclude the topics of gene patenting and embryonic stem cell research are unethical in some way. Although gene patenting blocks innovation and embryonic stem cell research promotes it, they both have laws that limit the impact on the world of science and medicine. According to Shapiro, â€Å"As these issues have moved to the center of public debate, the law has assumed an increasingly important place in the discipline of bioethics† (433). Thus, when the law puts limits on human genetics it becomes unethical and immoral according to both essays in this bioethical debate. WORD COUNT: 740 Works Cited Crichton, Michael. â€Å"Patenting Life. † Perspectives on Contemporary Issues: Readings Across the Disciplines. 6th ed. Ed. Katherine Anne Ackley. Boston: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning, 2012. 431-432. Print. Shapiro, S. Robyn. â€Å"Bioethics and the Stem Cell Research Debate. † Perspectives on Contemporary Issues: Readings Across the Disciplines. 6th ed. Ed. Katherine Anne Ackley. Boston: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning, 2012. 433-438. Print. How to cite The Bioethics Debate, Essay examples

1996 A Turbulent Year for Israel Essay Example For Students

1996: A Turbulent Year for Israel Essay 1996 has been a very turbulent year for Israel. This lies in theassassination of Yitzhak Rabin on November 4, 1995. Rabins great work in thepeace process with its Arab neighbors has been nearly reversed by Israelsnewly elected Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who actively opposed the peaceprocess in the election. Netanyahus term of service has not only affectedIsrael politically but also socially, intellectually, religiously, andeconomically. In dealing with Yasser Arafat and the Palestinians Netanyahu wasoriginally quoted saying that he would only meet with Arafat under specialcircumstances and that, the era of one-sided giving was over. WarrenChristopher, Secretary of State for the U.S., was able to arrange a peaceconference with Arafat on the Gaza border. One article called it a ,Psychological breakthrough (Netanyahu meets with Clinton). The issues at handwere Israel fulfilling its pledge to the Palestinians to redeploy its troopsstationed in the West Bank town of Hebron so that they will only guard the 440Jews who live there, from the tens of thousands of Palestinians. Also at issuewere the exit permits given to Palestinians allowing them to go from there jobsin Israel to there homes in Gaza and the and the West Bank. That leads toanother issue over whether or not a rail link between Gaza and the West Bankshould be formed. The major problem with that would be the cost. In the nextround of Israeli-PLO peace talks, both sides could not reach a compromise andafter four hours talks failed. To complicate matters further 3,000 houses wereapproved to be built in the West Bank by the Israeli government. Peace Nowspokesman, Alon Arnon, called the housing, A final burial of the hope ofpeace. (West Bank Settlement Approved) Netanyahu also ended the month byopening a tunnel to Muslim and Jewish Holy sites that resulted in bloody riotsthat killed 76 people. The month of October cooled down a bit with an ice breaking summit inWashington. Netanyahu returned with a change in attitude calling Arafat aperson whom he could resolve problems with. But aside from his change indemeanor no substantial agreements were made. In November Israel went on high alert in fear of an attack planned todisrupt the peace process, possibly on the one year anniversary of the Jihadsleader Fathi Shakaki. Again the peace effort was thrown back when the Israeligovernment announced plans to double the number of Jewish settlers in the WestBank. At one point Netanyahu asked the U.S. and Germany to help use theirinfluence in Iran and Syria to hold the terrorists at bay. Arafat also grewtired of what he considered to be stalling on the part of the Israeli government. He called for plans already agreed to, to be put in motion. Netanyahu thenmakes a statement that he envisions, A Palestinian entity with broad power,but fell short of declaring full independence. One article called this a signthat Netanyahu was, moving towards the Israeli political center.(NetanyahuMulls Palestine Land) Towards the end of November peace talks tookplace aboutthe redeployment of troops in Hebron. The main issue that stalled the talks wasIsraels insistence on written agreements that Israeli troops could chasePalestinian suspects into the city. In December, peace talks continued and as of now a decision was on theverge of being reached once final details were worked out. On January 1, 1997 aJewish military officer, believed to be mentally disturbed ,walked into aPalestinian market and opened fire. Waving after being arrested he said,Hebron, always and forever.Israel also had some serious problems with its Arab neighboringcountries. In September Israeli forces launched air and ground attacks tocounter Lebanese guerrillas who had ambushed an Israeli patrol. The guerrillasare part of Hezbollah, or party of god. Shortly after the attack Lebanon moved300 commandos to the southern border to, as a Lebanese statement says, copewith any Israeli venture in the region. Both Israel and Lebanon are underinvestigation to find if they had broken any cease-fire agreements. Jackie Robinson was the first baseball player to b EssayEconomically Israel has suffered under Netanyahus hard-line attitude. Some cold facts include: Exports rose only 4 percent(a third of the recent average increase) Tourism is down 10 percent Unemployment rose with Israels high tech industry reporting losses. The GNP spent on the military, currently a 10th is now rising. Netanyahu argued that these problems are inherited but experts citerising Arab-Israeli conflict scaring away foreign investment. Koor Industries,Israels largest industrial company reported their third quarter losses at tenpercent. The cause for the loss CEO, Benjamin Gaon, says is Israels highinterest rates and the shekels rise against the U.S. dollar. Towards the end of December Israel, in an attempt to lower the 300million a month deficit by raising taxes. This, experts claim is a result ofIsraels economic slowdown. Jacob Frenkel, the governor of the bank of Israelsays that the government should try to focus more on reducing the governmentspending(50% of the GNP) than raising taxes. Either way Netanyahu has a toughroad ahead of him to try to keep down inflation and taxes while still trying toreduce Israelis debt. Under Netanyahu Israel has seen rough times in all aspects. Netanyahusslow change towards the political center will better serve Israel, but is itgoing to be in time? Netanyahus continued West Bank Housing projects keepinfuriating the Arab world. In Israels future I see more bloodshed but hopestill exists for the peace that Prime Minister Rabin had hoped for before hisassassination. Politically I see peace on the horizon with Arafat and the PLObut see future conflicts with Syria over the Golan Heights. There will berenewed terrorist attacks with the Israeli pullout from Hebron because politicalextremists will not be settled until they obtain all of what they want. Themiddle east is one of the most volatile regions in the world so no one knows forsure what awaits it. Category: Social Issues